Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: mapping cone

Bottom of Page

1 to 13 of 13

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2009

    Explained at mapping cone how the mapping cone is model for a homotopy cofiber. In fact I used that to define and motivate the mapping cone.

    Then I moved the example in Top to the top of the list, as that is the archetypical example.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2011

    have added to mapping cone a new Examples-subsection In cochain complexes with a bunch of explicit details.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 30th 2012
    • (edited Aug 30th 2012)

    I have been working on mapping cone:

    1. polished and expanded the Definition-section.

    2. added a section Examples - In chain complexes

    In principle of course that should run dually to the formerly existing section In cochain complexes but right now both sections are organized a bit differently. Maybe I find the time to re-structure the section on cochain complexes later. But maybe not.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorjim_stasheff
    • CommentTimeAug 31st 2012
    @1 Urs: Explained at mapping cone how the mapping cone is model for a homotopy cofiber. In fact I used that to define and motivate the mapping cone.

    Then I moved the example in Top to the top of the list, as that is the archetypical example.

    well done - now that's an approach I can appreciate
    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 31st 2012

    Thanks, Jim.

    Positive feedback is indeed also appreciated. :-)

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 13th 2012
    • (edited Sep 13th 2012)

    I have further worked on the section Examples - In chain complexes.

    Now it includes also a detailed display of the differentials in cylinder/cone complexes and mapping cylcinder/mapping cone complexes and a detailed derivation and explanation of where the signs come from, systematically.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 13th 2012
    • (edited Sep 13th 2012)

    I have spelled out still more details of mapping cones in chain complex.

    Then I wrote a section Relation to homotopy fiber sequences which presents in full detail the proof that applying H n(−)H_n(-) to the long homotopy cofiber sequence of a monomorphism gives the long exact sequence in homology groups of its corresponding short exact sequence.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 18th 2012

    At mapping cone in Homology exact sequences and homotopy fiber sequences I tried to spell out (currently Lemma 1 there) more explicitly how

    H n(Z •)→H n(cone(f) •→Z •) −1H n(cone(f) •)→H n(X[1] •) H_n(Z_\bullet) \stackrel{H_n( cone(f)_\bullet \to Z_\bullet )^{-1}}{\to} H_{n}(cone(f)_\bullet) \to H_n(X[1]_\bullet)

    is the connecting homomorphism.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 18th 2012

    I have added a bit more glue-text to the section Distinguished triangles (which kept floating around in its form from the early days of this entry)

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 18th 2012
    • (edited Sep 18th 2012)

    added at mapping cone below the main definition (which is Prop. 1 currently) another remark, currently remark 1, invoking the standard picture of a cone over XX glued to YY. Eventually maybe somebody feels inspired to add the canonical illustration as an SVG graphics.

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 25th 2012

    It was pointed out to me by sombody attentive that my alleded proof of _this lemma (which asserts that a canonical map out of the mapping cone is a quasi iso) didn’t actually show injectivity on homology groups, but just on cycles. I have fixed that now.

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 15th 2014

    added the statement that also the total complex of the double complex induced by a chain map is a model for the mapping cone, here

  13. fixed typos

    Anonymous

    diff, v42, current

1 to 13 of 13

  1.