Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 15th 2010
    • (edited Oct 15th 2012)
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2012

    I have added to Cisinski model structure a section On presheaf toposes with the essence of the definitions and statements from section 1.3 of Cisinki’s book.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 3rd 2012

    I have been further expanding at Cisinski model structrure the section On presheaf toposes.

    Effectively I am now translating the entire chapter 1.3 of Cisinki’s book and spelling out details that the book leaves out.

    So far I have made it through all the preliminaries up to the main theorem stating the existence of the model structure.

    Next I’ll try to translate / write out the full proof of that.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeApr 3rd 2012

    Thank you! I’m sure this will be a great thing to have.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 4th 2012
    • (edited Apr 4th 2012)

    Good to hear that you find this useful. Right now I need these notes as a script for a seminar talk where I will present the proof – or at least a good bit of it…

    This morning, I have added a few more bits. The main new aspect for any potential reader is that I have added much more structure to the flow of the argument, see the new section outline at Cisinki model structure and the outline of the proof of the main theorem here. (Where “main theorem” still means “main theorem of section 1.3”, mind you.)

    The main remaining gap as far as details for the proofs go is currently the last section. I’ll try to take care of that now.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 17th 2012
    • (edited Apr 17th 2012)

    Added to Cisinski model structure a handful of items on “localizers” on presheaf categories, here

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 15th 2012

    added the remark that every Cisinski model structure is in particular combinatorial (and added an Examples-link the other way round).

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeAug 2nd 2017

    Can we describe the ∞-category underlying a Cisinski model structure in terms of its topos and localizer?

    As far as I understand, for a nonempty localizer the Cisinski model structure is the left Bousfield localization of the Cisinski model structure with the empty localizer at the morphisms in the localizer, which has an obvious ∞-categorical translation in terms of (reflective) localizations.

    However, what is the ∞-categorical meaning of the Cisinski model structure with the empty localizer?

    Staring at the examples it seems to me that for toposes of presheaves the underlying ∞-category should be just the ∞-category of ∞-presheaves. And for arbitrary toposes one can expect to get some version of ∞-sheaves, hypercompleted or not.

  1. Finish proof of [Cisinski 06, lemma 1.3.34], already started in the previous edit whithout comment, now only correcting typos.

    Gábor Braun

    diff, v44, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)