Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
  1. copying text from HoTT wiki

    Anonymous

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 7th 2022

    I understand that you are copying material, but let’s do a minimum of adjustment so that it makes sense in the larger context of the nLab.

    If you point to the nLab’s entry category then it’s hard for the reader to understand what kind of completion you have in mind. Better to point more specifically to internal category in homotopy type theory – at least for the first occasion.

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 7th 2022
    • (edited Jun 7th 2022)

    I am taking the liberty of adding to the References-section the following:

    The relation between Segal completeness (now often “Rezk completion”) for internal categories in HoTT and the univalence axiom had been pointed out in:

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 7th 2022
    • (edited Jun 7th 2022)

    I have completed the publication data for:

    By the way, if you list items (such as under “See also”) without a bullet or numbering in front, then the the parser thinks you keep starting new paragraphs for each item and produces overly large vertical whitespace. Best to use bullet lists markup like this:

    * an item
    * another
    * yet another
    

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 7th 2022
    • (edited Jun 7th 2022)

    I have changed the Theorem from a subsection to a theorem-environment (now here), analogously for the proof. Notice the easily remembered code:

    \begin{theorem}...\end{theorem} \begin{proof} ... \end{proof}
    

    By the way, after the proof ends, the text keeps going in a surprising/unclear way. Maybe there is some guiding text missing and/or the proof doesn’t actually end at that point.

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2022

    Added an intuition for Rezk completion by drawing an analogy with coherence for bicategories.

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorHurkyl
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2022

    Is there any risk of confusion with the localization from the ∞-category of segal spaces in ∞Gpd to the reflective subcategory of rezk-complete segal spaces?

    The content of this article seems related, but restricted specifically to the case where the hom-spaces are sets.

  2. added a sentence indicating that we are working in a dependent type theory where UIP or axiom K cannot be proven.

    Anonymous

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthormaxsnew
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2023

    A nice intuition for the Rezk completion

    diff, v6, current

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorHurkyl
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2023

    The thing this page computes is the same notion as the localization from segal space objects to complete segal space objects, but restricted to segal spaces whose hom-spaces are sets, right?

    Is this talked about on the nLab? Would this page be an appropriate place?

    The link to “Segal completion” just goes to the complete segal space page and doesn’t talk about forming completions. (and to me that that seems like a weird name for the operation)

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2023

    fixed \iso -> \cong in math mode

    diff, v7, current

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2023

    There should be a similar Rezk completion higher inductive type which turns Segal types into Rezk types in simplicial type theory.