Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-categories 2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty book bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2010

    I know that it’s pretty elementary, but sometimes teaching algebra makes you think of things, so I preserved some observations (mostly not my own) on the quadratic formula the other day.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorIan_Durham
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2010

    Actually, I think this might be a cool place to point out that attempting to find similarly simple solutions to higher-ordered polynomials is eventually what led to the invention/discovery of group theory (Mario Livio’s got a a really great book about the whole history of that). Plus, my students often find it really cool that, since group theory is the language of symmetry, there’s a link between polynomials and symmetry.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorHarry Gindi
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2010
    • (edited Jun 18th 2010)

    Gauss was using group theory for a significant amount of time before the work of Abel/Ruffini and Galois. What they discovered was the notion of solvability and the use of groups to probe the symmetries of finite separable field extensions (or in the classical formulation, the symmetries of polynomials).

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorIan_Durham
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2010

    What they discovered was the notion of solvability and the use of groups to probe the symmetries of field extensions (or in the classical formulation, the symmetries of polynomials).

    Still, I think it’s an interesting connection and it’s certainly an interesting historical point since a lot of the ideas developed there filtered into the broader theory along the way.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2010

    I made a sly link to solvable group (which is not yet written).

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2016

    Removed the comment that the ax 2+bx+c=0a x^2 + b x + c = 0 is soluble in characteristic 22 only if b=0b = 0, since x 2+xx^2 + x is a counterexample (00 is always a root). The sly link is thus no longer present.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2016

    Might it be worth keeping a comment that it may or may not be soluble in char = 2?

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2016

    I’ve added the content of #6 to the entry.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeSep 15th 2016
    • (edited Sep 15th 2016)

    Thanks, Dexter. David, I've done as you suggested. Zoran wrote solvable group back in 2011 (and I've since edited it), but now I made the link to solvable polynomial (which I just wrote).

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)