Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

Site Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

• CommentRowNumber1.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJun 17th 2010
• (edited Jun 17th 2010)

I am trying to remove the erroneous shifts in degree by $\pm 1$ that inevitably I have been making at simplicial skeleton and maybe at truncated.

So a Kan complex is the nerve of an $n$-groupoid iff it is $(n+1)$-coskeletal, I hope ;-)

At truncated in the examples-section i want to be claiming that the truncation adjunction in a general (oo,1)-topos is in the case of $\infty$Grpd the $(tr_{n+1} \dashv cosk_{n+1})$-adjunction on Kan complexes. But I should be saying this better.

• CommentRowNumber2.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJun 17th 2010

I typed out now what I think is a complete proof, see Truncation in ooGrpd.

• CommentRowNumber3.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJun 17th 2010

added some propositions and proofs on properties of truncation to Truncation - Properties - General

• CommentRowNumber4.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJun 18th 2010

added more details on the proof of the recursive definition of k-truncated morphisms here.