Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 28th 2022

    splitting this off from su(2)-anyons: Copied much of the material over, but also added a few more sentences.

    For the moment this entry is a cautionary tale about confirmation bias more than an entry about physics.

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 28th 2022

    changed page name to singular

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 19th 2022
    • (edited Nov 19th 2022)

    One more prominent retraction, now by Science [doi:10.1126/science.adf7575] (more commentary by Frolov here).

    This bubble has burst.

    diff, v3, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 4th 2022

    added pointer to this recent preprint:

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2022

    added publication data for:

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 24th 2023
    • (edited Aug 24th 2023)

    I just happen to see that, at long last, the latest claim by Microsoft Quantum has been published with Phys. Rev. B:

    Interestingly, the journal felt the need to accompany this by a caveat editorial:

    • Randall D. Kamien, Jessica Thomas, Stephen E. Nagler, Anthony M. Begley, and Sarma Kancharla, Editorial: Transparency in Physical Review Articles, Phys. Rev. B 107 210001 (2023) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.210001]

    saying:

    In this issue of Physical Review B, Aghaee et al. [1] report on an advancement towards the goal of topological quantum computing. While Physical Review readers are well aware that the many minutiæ of procedures, computations, and synthesis may be omitted in any particular dispatch, in this publication the intellectual property of the authors’ employer has prevented the release of some parameters of the studied devices that may be needed in order to reproduce them. As a reflection of the traditional values of the scholarly community, this is not in accordance with the usual norms of the Physical Review journals.

    S. Frolov claims that the peer review process was “manipulated”.

    [NB: While Frolov’s feed where this claim is made may not necessarily instill faith in his balanced judgement generally, he has a remarkable track record of calling out false announcements of detection of those “Majorana modes” — as referenced in detail in the entry.]

    diff, v8, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime18 hours ago
    • (edited 17 hours ago)

    added pointer to:

    diff, v11, current