Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory object of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: Gell-Mann principle

Bottom of Page

1 to 5 of 5

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 3rd 2022

    Just to record some references, prodded by discussion in another thread (here).

    From people’s question around the fora (e.g. Physics.SE:q/15339) I gather that the principle is referenced prominently in popular physics books by “Penrose, Hawking, Greene, etc.”, but I haven’t tracked those paragraphs down yet.

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 3rd 2022

    Anything that is not compulsory is forbidden

    But Kragh points out (p. 3) that this is the converse of what one wants:

    The statement Gell-Mann associated with a totalitarian state is not what is usually known as the TP. On the contrary, it is the converse of it.

    We want

    Anything that is not forbidden is compulsory.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 3rd 2022
    • (edited Oct 3rd 2022)

    Although, perhaps one should see them as equivalent (classically) (¬C→F\neg C \to F iff ¬F→C\neg F \to C).

    In modal terms, we might have

    not compulsory AA implies forbidden AA, as ¬□A→□¬A\neg \Box A \to \Box \neg A

    and

    not forbidden AA implies compulsory AA, as ¬□¬A→□A\neg \Box \neg A \to \Box A

    The latter, classically, is ◊A→□A\lozenge A \to \Box A, which tallies with the possibility = necessity idea.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 3rd 2022
    • (edited Oct 3rd 2022)

    Not the converse, but the contrapositive. [edit: oh, we overlapped]

    (I have added that term, and a few more references.)

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 3rd 2022

    Re #3:

    I’ll want to add the formulation in linear-modal-logic to this and related entries, but first to finish polishing up the entry quantum circuits via dependent linear types which will provide the justification.

1 to 5 of 5

  1.