Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I find this comment makes a good point in saying that pluralism is not actually the antonym to reductionism.
Currently in the entry it says about reductionism:
This contrasts with emergentism, which says that the entire field cannot be reduced to a common foundation.
I don’t see that “emergence” (or “emergentism”) is in contrast to reductionism. Instead it is only on a reductionist backdrop that it makes sense to speak of emergence in the first place.
The previous line in the entry says:
Reductionism is a philosophical position which states that all of that field can be reduced to a common foundation.
That doesn’t seem quite the right definition of reductionism, either.
May I ask where you are taking these statements from? (Are you the same Anonymous as in #1?)
1 to 4 of 4