Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorJ-B Vienney
   • CommentTimeDec 19th 2022
   • (edited Dec 19th 2022)
   • PermaLink
   Author: J-B Vienney
   Format: MarkdownItexAdded as examples: $0$, $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ and $\mathbb{B}=\{0,1\}$ with $1+1=0$. Proved that they are exactly the boolean rigs of cardinal less or equal than $2$. I don't know if boolean rigs in the sense of this entry are always commutative. In [The variety of Boolean semirings](https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/81147572.pdf), they show that they are commutative assuming that $1+x+x=1$. If some noncommutative boolean rig exists, it must be of cardinal $\ge 3$, not be a ring (because boolean rings are commutative) and not verify this equation. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/Boolean+rig/6">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Boolean+rig/6">v6</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Boolean+rig">current</a>

   Added as examples: $0$, $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ and $\mathbb{B}=\{0,1\}$ with $1+1=0$. Proved that they are exactly the boolean rigs of cardinal less or equal than $2$.

   I don’t know if boolean rigs in the sense of this entry are always commutative. In The variety of Boolean semirings, they show that they are commutative assuming that $1+x+x=1$. If some noncommutative boolean rig exists, it must be of cardinal $\ge 3$, not be a ring (because boolean rings are commutative) and not verify this equation.

   diff, v6, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorGuest
   • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2023
   • PermaLink
   Author: Guest
   Format: MarkdownItexAdded related concepts section <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/Boolean+rig/9">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Boolean+rig/9">v9</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Boolean+rig">current</a>

   Added related concepts section

   diff, v9, current