Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 12th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI had begun writing [[classifying topos of a localic groupoid]] and [[sheaves on a simplicial topological space]], but am (naturally) being distracted from nLab work now, so this is left in somewhat unfinished form...

   I had begun writing classifying topos of a localic groupoid and sheaves on a simplicial topological space, but am (naturally) being distracted from nLab work now, so this is left in somewhat unfinished form…

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeJul 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexThe nomenclature "classifying topos of a localic groupoid", although present in the title of that cited paper of Ieke's, sounds just a tad odd to my ears. Or is it usual to refer to $Set^G$ as the classifying topos of a group $G$? Yes, we can think of $Set^G$ as topos-theoretic cousin to the classifying space $B G$, but there is another cousin on the topos-theoretic side, namely $Sh(B G)$. They are a bit different, because for nice spaces $X$ the geometric morphisms $Sh(X) \to Sh(B G)$ correspond to continuous maps $X \to B G$, whereas geometric morphisms $Sh(X) \to Set^G$ correspond to $G$-torsors in $Sh(X)$, or equivalently to homotopy classes of continuous maps $X \to B G$.

   The nomenclature “classifying topos of a localic groupoid”, although present in the title of that cited paper of Ieke’s, sounds just a tad odd to my ears. Or is it usual to refer to $Set^G$ as the classifying topos of a group $G$?

   Yes, we can think of $Set^G$ as topos-theoretic cousin to the classifying space $B G$, but there is another cousin on the topos-theoretic side, namely $Sh(B G)$. They are a bit different, because for nice spaces $X$ the geometric morphisms $Sh(X) \to Sh(B G)$ correspond to continuous maps $X \to B G$, whereas geometric morphisms $Sh(X) \to Set^G$ correspond to $G$-torsors in $Sh(X)$, or equivalently to homotopy classes of continuous maps $X \to B G$.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJul 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexI don't know whether it's common to call $Set^G$ the "classifying topos of G." It seems to me that tradition aside, it has as much right to be called that as the space BG does to be called the "classifying space of G" -- in both cases what is actually being classified are G-torsors. But perhaps for that reason "the classifying space of G" was a confusing term from the beginning and we shouldn't compound the problem. Do I remember correctly that $Set^G$ and $Sh(BG)$ are actually "weak homotopy equivalent" as toposes?

   I don’t know whether it’s common to call $Set^G$ the “classifying topos of G.” It seems to me that tradition aside, it has as much right to be called that as the space BG does to be called the “classifying space of G” – in both cases what is actually being classified are G-torsors. But perhaps for that reason “the classifying space of G” was a confusing term from the beginning and we shouldn’t compound the problem.

   Do I remember correctly that $Set^G$ and $Sh(BG)$ are actually “weak homotopy equivalent” as toposes?

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 14th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItex> Do I remember correctly that $Set^G$ and $Sh(B G)$ are actually "weak homotopy equivalent" as toposes? Yes. This is discussed and proven in Ieke's Springer Lecture notes.

   Do I remember correctly that $Set^G$ and $Sh(B G)$ are actually “weak homotopy equivalent” as toposes?

   Yes. This is discussed and proven in Ieke’s Springer Lecture notes.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 14th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexIt's theorem 1.1, proven from page 77 on.

   It’s theorem 1.1, proven from page 77 on.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJun 3rd 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have 1. expanded a tad at _[[classifying topos of a localic groupoid]]_, 1. made _[[classifying topos of a topological groupoid]]_ a redirect to it, 1. added to _[[Grothendieck topos]]_ a brief remark under [Properties -- As localic groupoids](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Grothendieck+topos#AsLocalicGroupoids) (since any such mentioning had been missing there).

   I have

   1. expanded a tad at classifying topos of a localic groupoid,

   2. made classifying topos of a topological groupoid a redirect to it,

   3. added to Grothendieck topos a brief remark under Properties – As localic groupoids (since any such mentioning had been missing there).