Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorKevin Lin
   • CommentTimeJul 20th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Kevin Lin
   Format: HtmlAdded stub for [[GAGA]].

   Added stub for GAGA.
2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorJohn Baez
   • CommentTimeJul 25th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: John Baez
   Format: MarkdownItexGreat!

   Great!

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2014
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI'd like to boost the _[[GAGA]]_-related stuff on the $n$Lab a bit. So far I have at [[GAGA]] itself: * polished the Idea-section just a tad * started a subsection "Theorems", currently it only points to [[comparison theorem (étale cohomology)]] (which has been existing for a while) and [[Chow's theorem]] (which is a stub I just created) * added a pointer to [[Jean-Pierre Demailly]], _Analytic methods in algebraic geometry_, lecture notes 2009 ([pdf](http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~demailly/manuscripts/analmeth.pdf)) At _[[analytic space]]_, in the Idea-section, I tried to bring the point out more clearly by expanding slight. Now it reads as such: > Analytic spaces are [[spaces]] that are locally modeled on [[Isbell duality|formal duals]] of sub-[[associative algebra|algebras]] of [[power series]] algebras on elements with certain [[convergence]] properties with respect to given [[seminorms]]. This is in contrast to [[algebraic spaces]] ([[algebraic varieties]], [[schemes]]) where no [[convergence]] properties are considered > In [[complex number|complex]] [[analytic geometry]] analytic spaces -- [[complex analytic space]] -- are a vast generalization of complex [[analytic manifolds]] and are usually treated in the formalism of [[locally ringed spaces]]. In this case the _[[GAGA]]-principle_ closely relates [[complex analytic geometry]] with [[algebraic geometry]] over the [[complex numbers]]. I've been also cross-linking a bit further. More needs to be done here.

   I’d like to boost the GAGA-related stuff on the $n$Lab a bit. So far I have

   at GAGA itself:

   • polished the Idea-section just a tad

   • started a subsection “Theorems”, currently it only points to comparison theorem (étale cohomology) (which has been existing for a while) and Chow’s theorem (which is a stub I just created)

   • added a pointer to Jean-Pierre Demailly, Analytic methods in algebraic geometry, lecture notes 2009 (pdf)

   At analytic space, in the Idea-section, I tried to bring the point out more clearly by expanding slight. Now it reads as such:

   Analytic spaces are spaces that are locally modeled on formal duals of sub-algebras of power series algebras on elements with certain convergence properties with respect to given seminorms. This is in contrast to algebraic spaces (algebraic varieties, schemes) where no convergence properties are considered

   In complex analytic geometry analytic spaces – complex analytic space – are a vast generalization of complex analytic manifolds and are usually treated in the formalism of locally ringed spaces. In this case the GAGA-principle closely relates complex analytic geometry with algebraic geometry over the complex numbers.

   I’ve been also cross-linking a bit further. More needs to be done here.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2014
   • (edited May 22nd 2014)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexadded under "Theorems" also a pointer to _[[analytification]]_ and added the references discussing GAGA in higher geometry (stacks) * {#Lurie04} [[Jacob Lurie]], _[[Tannaka duality for geometric stacks]]_, ([arXiv:math.AG/0412266](http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0412266)) * {#Hall11} [[Jack Hall]], _Generalizing the GAGA Principle_ ([arXiv:1101.5123](http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5123)) * {#GeraschenkoZureickBrown12} [[Anton Geraschenko]], David Zureick-Brown, _Formal GAGA for good moduli spaces_ ([arXiv:1208.2882](http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.2882))

   added under “Theorems” also a pointer to analytification and added the references discussing GAGA in higher geometry (stacks)

   • {#Lurie04} Jacob Lurie, Tannaka duality for geometric stacks, (arXiv:math.AG/0412266)

   • {#Hall11} Jack Hall, Generalizing the GAGA Principle (arXiv:1101.5123)

   • {#GeraschenkoZureickBrown12} Anton Geraschenko, David Zureick-Brown, Formal GAGA for good moduli spaces (arXiv:1208.2882)

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2014
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItex> This is in contrast to algebraic spaces (algebraic varieties, schemes) where no convergence properties are considered This is quite a nonsense. In algebraic geometry one has regular, thus polynomial function, hence they __do__ converge. But one can consider formal spaces, like formal schemes, formal stacks...then one has formal power series without convergence and for them a similar statement makes sense. The present one should be removed.

   This is in contrast to algebraic spaces (algebraic varieties, schemes) where no convergence properties are considered

   This is quite a nonsense. In algebraic geometry one has regular, thus polynomial function, hence they do converge. But one can consider formal spaces, like formal schemes, formal stacks…then one has formal power series without convergence and for them a similar statement makes sense. The present one should be removed.