Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: definability (fibred category theory)

Bottom of Page

1 to 10 of 10

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthormattecapu
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2023

    Started page on definability à là Benabou

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2023

    In the first sentence

    Suppose we have a fibration p:ℰ→ℬp \colon \mathcal{E} \to \mathcal{B}, representing type families (living in the fibers of ℰ\mathcal{E}) indexed by contexts (living in ℬ\mathcal{B}).

    probably “fibration” means “Grothendieck fibration”? (I have now hyperlinked it as such). But then referring to this as a “type family” is unusual – unless maybe you want to speak of directed type theory?

    I think this should be clarified.

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthormattecapu
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2023
    • (edited Mar 29th 2023)
    Yeah it means Grothendieck fibration. Maybe the phrasing is slightly odd, I mean to say objects in E are type families.
    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2023

    Oh, I see. So I misread what you mean. (Haven’t take much time with the entry, admittedly).

    But then lets’ say this in the entry: “whose objects are type families”.

    And add a link to category with families! (or whatever it may be)

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthormattecapu
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2023
    Ok great, I'll rephrase it.
    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthormattecapu
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2023

    Changed opening sentence as suggested by Urs

    diff, v3, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2023

    Thanks. So I have appended pointer to categorical semantics of dependent types.

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthormattecapu
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2023

    Changed context dropdown to ’fibred category theory’

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthormattecapu
    • CommentTimeApr 3rd 2023

    Added definition of definable collections of functors, vertical morphisms, subfibrations

    diff, v6, current

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 3rd 2023

    I have made the link to “fibered terminal object” that you request here point to fibered limit.

    But now I realize it may not be the pointer you intend(?):

    In the usual language a fibered category p:E→Bp \colon E \to B has a fibered terminal object if (e.g. p. 6 here) EE and BB have terminal objects and pp preserves the terminal object. To get from there to the condition you state one needs an extra assumption, I suppose, such as the base change preserving limits, hence such as the fibration being a bifibration. No? Maybe you could expand on this point in the entry.

1 to 10 of 10

  1.