Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: pseudomonic functor

Bottom of Page

1 to 8 of 8

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 29th 2023
    • (edited Apr 29th 2023)

    added more hyperlinks.

    such as to combinatorial species and to 2-pullback

    diff, v13, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2023

    added pointer to:

    diff, v15, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthormattecapu
    • CommentTimeSep 22nd 2023

    Added remark about essential injectivity

    diff, v17, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeSep 22nd 2023

    Corrected the link to essentially injective functor. Not sure why it was pointing to essentially surjective functor instead?

    diff, v18, current

  5. Removed the sentence “In fact, being full on isomorphisms is exactly what essential injectivity means.”

    In fact, essential injectivity is a weaker statement, namely that FA≅FBFA\cong FB implies A≅BA\cong B.

    Jonas Frey

    diff, v19, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorncfavier
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2024

    Added a reference to On property-like structures by Kelly

    diff, v20, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2024
    • (edited Mar 18th 2024)

    added pointer to the original:

    diff, v21, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 18th 2024

    I moved this remark (from rev 10) out of the Examples-section to after the main definition:

    Arguably, pseudomonic functors are precisely the functors for which it makes sense to say that AA is uniquely determined by FAF A up to unique isomorphism. However, we do not really need faithfulness for this; bijectivity on isos suffices.

    But the wording needs adjustment: It makes no sense to first claim it is “precisely” so only to then say that it is not actually so.

    diff, v21, current

1 to 8 of 8

  1.