Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality education elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes science set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorFinnLawler
    • CommentTimeAug 8th 2010

    Added a proof of the pasting lemma to pullback, and the corresponding lemma to comma object (also added the construction by pullbacks and cotensors there).

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMarc
    • CommentTimeAug 10th 2010
    Actually the statement of your proposition is wrong. If the right square in


    A --> B --> C
    | | |
    v v v
    D --> E --> F


    is a pullback then the two statements

    (i) the outer rectangle is a pullback
    (ii) the left square is a pullback

    are equivalent. But it may well happen that both (i) and (ii) hold,
    without the right square being a pullback.

    For instance let i: A --> B be a split mono with retraction p: B --> A
    and consider


    A ==== A ==== A
    | | |
    | |i |
    | v |
    A ---> B ---> A
    i p


    where all unnamed maps are identity maps. Then the left square and
    the outer rectangle are pullbacks but the right square cannot be
    a pullback unless i was already an isomorphism.
    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorFinnLawler
    • CommentTimeAug 10th 2010
    • (edited Aug 10th 2010)

    Well spotted. The mistake in the ’proof’ is in confusing cones over (def,cf)(d \to e \to f, c \to f) and cones over (de,ef,cf)(d \to e, e \to f, c \to f). I think they are the same iff the right square is a pullback.

    Edit: I made the same mistake at comma object. Both fixed now, I think.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)