Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
  
  
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorEric
   • CommentTimeAug 12th 2010
   • (edited Aug 12th 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Eric
   Format: MarkdownItexHi, I've been excited around here lately as I learn about functors and forms, higher transport, 2-groupoids, and 2-categories. As usual though, I need to "find my own way", which is understandably frustrating. Anyway, I think I've found my own way to understand 2-categories and it involves cooking up a construction I call the "boundary of a 2-morphism". I've written up some of my thoughts on my personal web: * [[ericforgy:Boundary of a 2-Morphism and the Interchange Law]] I'd love to hear your thoughts. Is it nuts? Is it useful? Is it interesting? I thought the calculation involving the interchange law was particularly cute. What do you think? Best regards, Eric

   Hi,

   I’ve been excited around here lately as I learn about functors and forms, higher transport, 2-groupoids, and 2-categories.

   As usual though, I need to “find my own way”, which is understandably frustrating. Anyway, I think I’ve found my own way to understand 2-categories and it involves cooking up a construction I call the “boundary of a 2-morphism”.

   I’ve written up some of my thoughts on my personal web:

   • Boundary of a 2-Morphism and the Interchange Law (ericforgy)

   I’d love to hear your thoughts. Is it nuts? Is it useful? Is it interesting? I thought the calculation involving the interchange law was particularly cute. What do you think?

   Best regards,

   Eric

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorEric
   • CommentTimeAug 15th 2010
   • (edited Aug 15th 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Eric
   Format: MarkdownItexI've added a little more [[ericforgy:Boundary of a 2-Morphism and the Interchange Law|material]] and have also tried asking a question on [MO](http://mathoverflow.net/questions/35622/2-groups-are-to-crossed-modules-as-2-categories-are-to). By the way, thinking in terms of parallel transport provides a very nice picture for the boundary of horizontally composed 2-morphisms in a 2-groupoid, i.e. with four morphisms $f,f':y\to z$ and $g,g':x\to y$ and two 2-morphisms $\alpha:f\Rightarrow f'$ and $\beta:g\Rightarrow g'$ $$\partial(\alpha\circ\beta) = \partial\alpha\circ f'\circ\partial\beta\circ f'^{-1}.$$ To interpret this, we can think of $\partial(\alpha\circ\beta)$ as a group element located at object $z$, $\partial\alpha$ as a group element also located at $z$, but $\partial\beta$ is a group element located at $y$. To "compare" $\partial\alpha$ and $\partial\beta$ we need to "transport the transport", i.e. transport the group element $\partial\beta$ at $y$ to $z$. The above formula says that to do this, we backtrack from $z$ to $y$ along $f'^{-1}$, then traverse $\partial\beta$, and finally carry the result back to $z$ along $f'$. Neat :)

   I’ve added a little more material and have also tried asking a question on MO.

   By the way, thinking in terms of parallel transport provides a very nice picture for the boundary of horizontally composed 2-morphisms in a 2-groupoid, i.e. with four morphisms and and two 2-morphisms and

   To interpret this, we can think of as a group element located at object , as a group element also located at , but is a group element located at . To “compare” and we need to “transport the transport”, i.e. transport the group element at to . The above formula says that to do this, we backtrack from to along , then traverse , and finally carry the result back to along . Neat :)