Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeMay 13th 2024

    Created a page. Right now mostly references.

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeMay 13th 2024

    There was some recent addition of pages on classifying spaces, including their cohomology, as mentioned eg here.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 13th 2024
    • (edited May 13th 2024)

    more references for cohomology of BO(n)B O(n) are also recorded at orthogonal group, here.

    we should maybe make an !include-entry for a comprehensive list of these references so that all these lists get harmonized and synchronized

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeMay 13th 2024

    Out of interest, what counts as a classifying space? The spheres as classifying spaces for cohomotopy? At classifying space we have CatCat as the “classifying space for categories”.

    I see also there at we have a section on cohomology which includes Segal completion – table.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 13th 2024

    True. There is the traditional meaning of classifying spaces as variants of bar constructions for topological groups, classifying the corresponding principal bundles on nice enough base spaces.

    That traditional meaning is often implied by default, such as in the entry that Dmitri is starting here.

    But just going by the literal meaning of the words “classifying space” there can be classifying spaces for other or more general things – such as for cohomology theories — and it’s often useful to have the term be understood in this more general sense.

    On the other hand, calling “Cat” a classifying space is a bit of an abuse of terminology. If one called it at least a “directed classifying space” it would make better sense.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 14th 2024
    • (edited May 14th 2024)

    (I have now edited at classifying space in order to clarify, see the log message there)

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeMay 16th 2024

    Added Feshbach’s paper.

    diff, v2, current