Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 9th 2010
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeSep 9th 2010

    In 2-category this is standard, but if n>2n\gt 2 I would rather talk about vertical composition of nn-cells along (n1)(n-1)-cells, rather than of 2-cells along 1-cells anymore. What is standard ? In any case, the vertical composition of anything is always strictly associative.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 9th 2010

    Right, the discussion should be generalized.

    On the other hand, “vertical” is unambiguous only for 2-categories. You seem to adopt the convention that “vertical” composition of nn-morphisms is always that along (n1)(n-1)-morphisms. Is that universally accepted? I rarely seem to hear people talk about “horizontal” and “vertical” for nn-categories above n>2n \gt 2.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeSep 9th 2010

    Is that universally accepted?

    You may either not use the vertical terminology for any composition of nn-cells or use for that one. As this is the only one which is just clean associative composition in general, and which does not restrict to any composition of lower level cells. Horizontal composition of 22 cells, restricts to 11 cells, and is not strictly associative; similarly any other composition of any cells in weak higher category, except the vertical composition which I mentioned. In the case of category of (n1)(n-1)-categories, you need Godement-like rules to define any composition except what I call above vertical. So it is logical to me to keep the terminology that way. But I do not know what is standard.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)