Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I included a bunch of equivalent definitions of ’von Neumann regular ring’, and a proof of what’s essentially Lemma 5 from von Neumann’s original paper. This clarifies the funny-looking equation .
My lemma and proof are not correctly formatted. Maybe someone could do that? I always have to look up how to do it.
I don’t know if it’s the best way but I just wrote \begin{lemma} \end{lemma} \begin{proof} \end{proof} and it works fine.
have replaced the broken link “[[Morita invariant]]
” by “invariant under Morita equivalences”
1 to 9 of 9