Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
  
  
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorZhen Huan
   • CommentTimeOct 5th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: Zhen Huan
   Format: MarkdownItexI have a maybe basic question but I cannot figure it out. We know on the free loop space **LX** of a smooth manifold **X**, there is a circle action induced by the rotation. If we consider any an (∞,1)-category _C_ with (∞,1)-pullbacks instead of the category of smooth manifolds, we can define the free loop space object, as we can see here https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/free+loop+space+object#CircleAction Can we still have a higher "rotation" on a free loop object? I don't think the intrinsic circle action on that page is equivalent to "rotation". Thanks.

   I have a maybe basic question but I cannot figure it out. We know on the free loop space LX of a smooth manifold X, there is a circle action induced by the rotation. If we consider any an (∞,1)-category C with (∞,1)-pullbacks instead of the category of smooth manifolds, we can define the free loop space object, as we can see here https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/free+loop+space+object#CircleAction Can we still have a higher “rotation” on a free loop object? I don’t think the intrinsic circle action on that page is equivalent to “rotation”. Thanks.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeOct 5th 2024
   • (edited Oct 5th 2024)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexThis is the issue of passing from - the circle $S^1$ regarded as a Lie group and as such as a smooth group $\infty$-stack which is 0-truncated but not geometrically discrete to - its "shape" $ʃ S^1$ which is equivalently the "simplicial circle" and as such a smooth group $\infty$-stack which is 1-truncated but geometrically discrete. The shape unit map $$ \eta_{S^1} : S^1 \mapsto ʃ S^1 $$ respects these $\infty$-group structures and hence records what becomes of the "naive" $S^1$ action by rotation as one passes to homotopy types and is left "only" with the higher group action of $ʃ S^1$. The relation between - the free loop space of the form $Map(S^1, (-))$, with its naive action by circle rotation to - the free loop space $Map(ʃ S^1, ʃ (-))$, with only a homotopy-action by $ʃ S^1$ left is to a large part the topic of that article "[[schreiber:Cyclification of Orbifolds|Cyclification of Orbifolds]]", beginning [p. 13](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.13836#page=13).

   This is the issue of passing from

   • the circle regarded as a Lie group and as such as a smooth group -stack which is 0-truncated but not geometrically discrete

   to

   • its “shape” which is equivalently the “simplicial circle” and as such a smooth group -stack which is 1-truncated but geometrically discrete.

   The shape unit map

   respects these -group structures and hence records what becomes of the “naive” action by rotation as one passes to homotopy types and is left “only” with the higher group action of .

   The relation between

   • the free loop space of the form , with its naive action by circle rotation

   to

   • the free loop space , with only a homotopy-action by left

   is to a large part the topic of that article “Cyclification of Orbifolds”, beginning p. 13.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorZhen Huan
   • CommentTimeOct 5th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: Zhen Huan
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks! Zhen

   Thanks! Zhen