Author: DavidRoberts Format: MarkdownItexAt [[period]] it was claimed that the ring of periods $P\subset \mathbb{C}$ is a subfield of $\mathbb{C}$. It is conjectured (see, e.g. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_periods">wikipedia</a>) that $1/\pi$ is not a period, and since $\pi$ _is_ a period, $P$ is not expected to be a field. I've fixed this up.
At period it was claimed that the ring of periods is a subfield of . It is conjectured (see, e.g. wikipedia) that is not a period, and since is a period, is not expected to be a field. I’ve fixed this up.