Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
This may just show my ignorance, but I am wondering how to see the following:
For k∈ℕ>0 and a∈ℕ, the expression
Sk(a)≔k−1∑n=0eπik(n+a)2is independent of a if k is even:
kis even⇒∀a(Sk(a)=Sk(0)).In a roundabout way this follows from the modular transformation law of conformal characters of the U(1) WZW model.
But what’s an elementary arithmetic way to see this?
(If the exponent had another factor of “2”, then it would follow easily, also for odd k, by modular arithmetic, now in the other sense of “modular”. But the question is for the exponent as given.)
I guess the squares repeat with period k. If k is even then (k+a)2−a2=2ak+k2 is 0 mod 2k.
I am prepared to find that I am missing the obvious – but could you expand on how this answers the question?
Oh, I think I see what you mean. Right.
Right, so the summands are k-periodic after all, because
eπik(n+k)2=eπik(n2+2nk+k2)=eπikn2eπi(2n+k)⏟1ifkeven=eπikn2and so if we shift n↦n+a in the exponent, then we may just relabel to get rid of the a.
Thanks! :-)
Sorry for being cryptic. A snatched moment when supposed to be supporting my wife in her clothes shopping for our daughter’s wedding!
1 to 6 of 6