Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I do not like having this page, and I think the fact two different things get called Ass by only some people in the literature (and the unambiguous Assoc and Asm by others) is an argument against using Ass generally in the nLab, and only acknowledging in passing that some references use it for these two different concepts.
I would like to add the line
The nLab uses and recommends the differentiated notations.
except it’s possibly not quite true, yet.
Do we really need to start this article with
“Ass” is an obscenity in the English language.
Are we trying to communicate something of value to the nLab here?
I think the community should come to an agreement, rather than that type of one-person decision.
And if there is a need for any centralized decision-making by a smaller group than the whole community, we have a steering committee (nlabmeta).
Personally, I think it’s okay to have a simple disambiguation page, but I don’t think it needs any discussion of discouragement or any reasons why. So v7 looks good to me as the permanent solution.
I think rolling back to the original version, which read
In mathematics, Ass can refer to
The associative operad
The category of assemblies
is slightly better. The current version, to my ears, sounds too pointed and too self-conscious.
Sure, that’s fine with me too. I don’t see a big difference.
1 to 13 of 13