Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topological topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeJun 8th 2025

    Deleted the article. Here is its former content:

    • tic {:toc}

    This is an experiment in collaboration. I want to write an article about discrete causal spaces. Please help. Coauthors welcome! - Eric

    Goals

    1. Construct a generalization of Discrete differential geometry on causal graphs to nn-dimensional discrete causal spaces that are locally like nn-diamonds (see the paper for a description of nn-diamonds until a page is created).

    2. The continuum limit of a discrete causal space should be a directed space, or more specifically, a smooth Lorentzian space.

    3. Etc

    Abstract

    Introduction

    We need a good category-friendly definition of an nn-diamond. Here’s a first stab that is incomplete, but hopefully gets the ball rolling.

    (Tentative/Incomplete) Definition: An nn-diamond is a minimal causet.

    (Tentative/Incomplete) Definition: An nn-diamond complex is a directed n-graph in which each node has exactly nn edges directed into it and exactly nn nodes directed away from it and each ??? has fillers.

    Example: n\mathbb{Z}^n with the its obvious rr-diamond faces, 0rn0\le r\le n is an nn-diamond complex.

    References

    • Marco Grandis, Directed homotopy theory, I. The fundamental category (arXiv)
    • Tim Porter: Enriched categories and models for spaces of evolving states, Theoretical Computer Science, 405, (2008), pp. 88–100.
    • Tim Porter, Enriched categories and models for spaces of dipaths. A discussion document and overview of some techniques (pdf)
    • Fajstrup, Rosicky, A convenient category for directed homotopy (arXiv)
    • Dan Christensen, and Louis Crane, Causal sites as quantum geometry (arXiv) +–{.query} Eric: They use the word “diamond”. I hope that catches on. =–
    • Louis Crane, Model categories and quantum gravity (arXiv)
    • Bombelli, Henson, Sorkin, Discreteness without symmetry breaking: a theorem (arXiv)
    • Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 04351, Spatial Representation: Discrete vs. Continuous Computational Models, (web)

    See also:


    Discussion

    Note. Topics will be separated by lines and each topic is presented in reverse chronological order.

    JA: Just starting reading this and don’t know much about diamonds yet, but I have been working on logic-based approaches to discrete dynamics — that I sometimes think of as differential geometry over GF(2) — for quite a while now. You might take a gander at my Magnum Opiate and we could see if it fits in here somewhere.


    Eric: Motivated by some emails from Tim, I think we could use pages on causal site and dg-quiver. I am particularly interested in seeing a definition of dg-quiver.


    Eric: I wonder if nn-diamonds should be more closely related to n-fold categories rather than posets?


    (From nCafe: Authorship)

    Urs says: I think Eric wants a poset of sorts.

    It seems that a good formalization of “smooth Lorentzian space(time)” is something like: a poset internal to a category of measure spaces.

    There are some immediate possibilities about graph versions of this statement that come to mind. For one, a discrete “Lorentzian spacetime” should be a poset such that all causal subsets are finite set.

    A causal subset in a poset XX is what John in his latest entry calls an “interval”, namely for two objects x,yx,y in the poset the under-over category

    xXyx\darr X\darr y

    of all objects in the past of xx and in the future of yy.

    Tim: In a poset one can define a diamond as being an order convex subset possibly with extra properties: U is order convex if xx, zz are in UU with x<zx \lt z, and yy lies between xx and zz (x<y<zx\lt y \lt z).

    One possible interpretation of what Eric wants is that one specifies a collection of order convex subsets with inclusion on them making a directed set or possibly a lattice. (sort of needing to capture that diamonds should intersect in diamonds (or not at all). Something like this is used by John Roberts in some of his work I seem to remember.

    Reminder (’cos I thought this had been mentioned in the café) it may also pay to look at gr-qc/0410104 for some ideas but I never convinced myself that that was really what was needed.

    category: drafts

    !redirects Discrete Causal Spaces

    diff, v17, current