Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I split off ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos from locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos and added a proof that a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos is ∞-connected iff the left adjoint preserves the terminal object, just as in the 1-categorical case. I also added a related remark to shape of an (∞,1)-topos saying that when H is locally ∞-connected, its shape is represented by .
I hope that these are correct, but it would be helpful if someone with a little more -categorical confidence could make sure I’m not assuming something that doesn’t carry over from the 1-categorical world.
Thanks, Mike!
This does look correct. For the single possibly nonevident point– that every -groupoid is the -colimit over itself of the diagram constant on the point – I have added a link to this proposition.
Thanks.
1 to 3 of 3