Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeOct 26th 2010
   • (edited Oct 26th 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownItexAs I need trees as relational structures for my modal logic stuff, I have added something on them in [[tree]]. I took this from of the definition from Blackburn et al, and it seems to me to be related to the previous paragraph in [[tree]]. Any thoughts? I am not 100% happy with my addition as there seem to be some awkwardness in their formulation. I am trying to go towards a n-dim analogue of modal stuff, and [[tree|here]] the relation $S$ has properties that state that its converse relation $S^{op}$ is a partial function with domain the set of nodes minus the root. Looking at this homotopically it says that $S^{op}$ forms part of a contracting homotopy. This in turn suggests that there is a perhaps useful n-relational structure obtained from an n-dim contractible complex (generalising a converse to simple homotopy operations). Has anyone come on something like this explicitly? The idea is a fairly elementary one to have but a nPOV type development might be fun at least.

   As I need trees as relational structures for my modal logic stuff, I have added something on them in tree. I took this from of the definition from Blackburn et al, and it seems to me to be related to the previous paragraph in tree. Any thoughts? I am not 100% happy with my addition as there seem to be some awkwardness in their formulation.

   I am trying to go towards a n-dim analogue of modal stuff, and here the relation $S$ has properties that state that its converse relation $S^{op}$ is a partial function with domain the set of nodes minus the root. Looking at this homotopically it says that $S^{op}$ forms part of a contracting homotopy. This in turn suggests that there is a perhaps useful n-relational structure obtained from an n-dim contractible complex (generalising a converse to simple homotopy operations). Has anyone come on something like this explicitly? The idea is a fairly elementary one to have but a nPOV type development might be fun at least.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeJul 17th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexI added to [[tree]] a new subsection, outlining some of Joachim Kock's point of view on the relation between trees and [[polynomial endofunctors]]. (I had an inkling this would be somewhat relevant to the recent additions by Jon Beardsley on generalized graphs, etc., which is what instigated this addition.) There's a quick gloss on a double category which I didn't check too carefully.

   I added to tree a new subsection, outlining some of Joachim Kock’s point of view on the relation between trees and polynomial endofunctors. (I had an inkling this would be somewhat relevant to the recent additions by Jon Beardsley on generalized graphs, etc., which is what instigated this addition.) There’s a quick gloss on a double category which I didn’t check too carefully.