Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories accessible adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology newpage nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeOct 28th 2010

    I have started a page on knot groups. So far I have outlined how to get the Dehn presentation.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeOct 29th 2010
    • (edited Oct 29th 2010)

    Completed how to get the Dehn presentation and have given a worked example of a cinquefoil knot.

    One point that intrigues me is how can one categorify the Tietze transformation technology. It seems difficult even at the second level.. i.e. a presentation of 2-group. Has any one seen anything like this?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeOct 31st 2010

    No, but I’m intrigued! At times(*) I have wondered (and actually worked on) how to define a fundamental crossed module of some sort of cellular space (say CW complex, or |delta|delta-complex) as a slim and easy counterpart to the big and ugly fundamental bigroupoid that I know it has. When I think about trying these ideas on a knot-complement, then I think I run into some trouble due to a lack of cellular structure. If there was a nice algorithm to decompose the knot-complement, I might be able to do this. Otherwise, some wort of movie moves approach might work…

    (*)when I was supposed to be finishing my thesis write-up

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeOct 31st 2010

    Joao has written a paper The Fundamental Crossed Module of the Complement of a Knotted Surface. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 361 (2009), 4593-4630. which does something a bit on those lines.

    In fact one of the reasons for writing these draft pages on knot groups etc. was, for me, to revisit some of the web of ideas van Kampen, Wirtinger, covering spaces, Tietze transformations, etc. to see if the current knowledge on vKTs etc in higher dimensions could allow the development of 2-dimensional analogues of hypothetical missing pieces.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeOct 31st 2010

    Joao’s publications are listed at

    http://ferrari.dmat.fct.unl.pt/~jnm/

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeOct 31st 2010

    Thanks, Tim. I’ll check them out.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)