Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorJonAwbrey
   • CommentTimeOct 17th 2009
   • (edited Oct 19th 2009)
   • PermaLink
   Author: JonAwbrey
   Format: MarkdownHere's an example of the form I use for type specs of combinators: * [Composer in MediaWiki](http://mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey/Papers/Propositions_As_Types#Step_2_2) Here's how it comes out in the nLab: * [Composer in InStikiWiki](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Sandbox#type_spec_2) In Windows + Firefox, the down arrows come out looking stretched and patched together from pieces of unequal width. I guess I can use the unicode ⇓ for the time being …

   Here's an example of the form I use for type specs of combinators:

   • Composer in MediaWiki

   Here's how it comes out in the nLab:

   • Composer in InStikiWiki

   In Windows + Firefox, the down arrows come out looking stretched and patched together from pieces of unequal width.

   I guess I can use the unicode ⇓ for the time being …

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeOct 17th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownIt looks fine to me, except for Version 0, where the arrows are unusually large. (The MathML has the normal symbol; I don't know why Firefox is rendering it so large.) Note that I'm using Deja Vu as my fonts, rather than the STIX fonts; although Deja Vu may have fewer characters, it seems to have everything that we need and usually looks better to my eye.

   It looks fine to me, except for Version 0, where the arrows are unusually large. (The MathML has the normal symbol; I don't know why Firefox is rendering it so large.) Note that I'm using Deja Vu as my fonts, rather than the STIX fonts; although Deja Vu may have fewer characters, it seems to have everything that we need and usually looks better to my eye.