Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2010

    started monoidal Quillen adjunction

    (still need to fill in the properties and theorems)

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2010

    added the statement of two theorems:

    • recognition of lax monoidal Quillen adjunctions;

    • lifts to Quillen adjunctions on model categories of monoids

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2010
    • (edited Nov 4th 2010)

    at monoidal Quillen adjunction I started writing out the detailed proof of the theorem that asserts that monoidal Quillen adjunctions lift to Quillen adjunctions for monoids under mild conditions.

    The proof depends on a very technical lemma. The proof of that lemma I have not yet finished typing up. But I need to call it quits for today.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2010

    2am! you sure do.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 18th 2010
    • (edited Nov 18th 2010)

    I am in the process of filling the remaining gaps in the nnLab-writeup of the full Schwede-Shipley proof of the monoidal Dold-Kan correspondence. The main work happens at monoidal Quillen adjunction, so I am working on completing the proof given there.

    Now I have completed the description of the adjuncton (L monR)(L^{mon} \dashv R) on categories of monoids induced from a right adjoint lax monoidal functor R:CDR : C \to D on a monoidal category CC with colimits: lift to an adjunction of monoids.

    Next comes the Quillen-property. And I may still have to add some general statements on colimits in categories of monoids in categories with colimits.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 18th 2010
    • (edited Nov 18th 2010)

    made slow progress with making explicit some of the intermediate steps that Schwede-Shipley gloss over. Now I am about one-third through the long proof of lemma 5.1 in their Equivalence of monoidal model categories .

    I’ll also need to go through lemma 6.2 of their previous Algebras and modules in monoidal model categories which is used throughout.

    All very technical and not very insightful.

    I’ll have to interrupt now for a bit, will continue later.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 19th 2010
    • (edited Nov 19th 2010)

    I think I am pretty much through with typing up all the details of the proof of the monoidal Dold-Kan correspondence following Schwede-Shipley. Tried to make everything explicit – except the proverbial straightforward but tedious string manipulations arising whenever the computation of pushouts along free monoid maps in terms iterated pushouts as described at category of monoids gets invoked. I hope we can trust Schwede and Shipley that they checked this. There ought to be a shortcut around this messy issue…

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeMay 31st 2019

    Added a redirect for “monoidal Quillen functor”.

    diff, v27, current