Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: generalized multicategory

Bottom of Page

1 to 6 of 6

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2010
    • (edited Nov 12th 2010)

    There is a student here who is thinking about how to relate ∞\infty-algebraic theories with ∞\infty-operads and in the course of that also dendroidal sets with Lurie-type “∞\infty-categories of operations” of ∞\infty-operads.

    I am trying to help a bit where I can. First of all I thought I’d need to get a better idea of how the triangle

    monads operads algebraictheories \array{ && monads \\ \\operads &&&& algebraic theories }

    works in 1-category theory. So I am naturally looking at Mike’s Generalized Virtuology to get some hints.

    I had planned to typeup the little that I understand about the relation between Lawvere theories and generalized multicategories, but now I ended up spending some time just on the entry on virtual double categories. Here is what I did

    • created a subsection “Monads on virtual double categories” with the basic definitions

      • and further subsections on “Monoids and modules” (this existed as an empty stub before)

      • and “Generalized multicategories” (with the basic definition, then pointing over to generalized multicategory of course).

    I also

    I took the liberty of mentioning the term “fc-multicategory” at the beginning of virtual double category (because that happens to remind me easier of what the term refers to) and at virtual equipment I said that this term is short for “proarrow equipment of a virtual double category”.

    (Hm, that summary of what i did is almost longer than the little bit of text that I acutally added! :-)

    Mike, here is a question:

    when I read your article with Cruttwell, I have slight trouble when it comes to definition 8.2 of normalized monoids. It has a horizontal morphism labeled U AU_A where definition 4.2 has an equality. It seems. Is there a typo in one of these or did I miss some further definition in the intermediate four sections (not unlikely)?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2010

    Thank you! Geoff and I have been meaning to improve those pages for a while, but haven’t had time yet.

    Definition 8.2 only makes sense in a virtual equipment, or at least a virtual double category with units (defined in section 5). When you have units, there is a natural bijection (essentially by definition of “units”) between cells of nullary source starting at an object A, and cells of unary source whose source is a unit horizontal arrow U AU_A. Definition 4.2 uses the former, since at that point we are only in a virtual double category, while 8.2 refers (implicitly) to the equivalent cell of the latter form, since only a cell of unary source can be said to be cartesian. Does that clarify?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeFeb 6th 2014

    I added a reference to a recent paper of Hyland to generalized multicategory.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthormattecapu
    • CommentTimeJan 23rd 2023
    • (edited Jan 23rd 2023)

    Are Burroni’s T-categories the same thing as generalized multicategories? It seems to me they are. If yes I will add the reference to the page

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthormaxsnew
    • CommentTimeJan 23rd 2023

    Oui. Looks like an oversight in the references here

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeJul 16th 2024

    Added the original reference.

    diff, v23, current

1 to 6 of 6

  1.