Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeDec 6th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexstub for [[irreducible polynomial]]

   stub for irreducible polynomial

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeDec 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexI never heard of "identity polynomial", especially in this context. Polynomial can be an identity from the ground ring, but it seems you mean in this definition a UNIT polynomial. While it is logical to say identity polynomial for polynomial which is equal to the constant identity in the ground ring/field and it is standard to say unit polynomial to mean the polynomial which is UNIT in the ground ring (hence in the polynomial ring as well) it is not logical to say identity polynomial for an arbitrary unit in the ground ring embedded as a polynomial. A **unit** in a ring is any invertible element in the ring. This is very different from more special concept of the identity ("the unit element") element.

   I never heard of “identity polynomial”, especially in this context. Polynomial can be an identity from the ground ring, but it seems you mean in this definition a UNIT polynomial. While it is logical to say identity polynomial for polynomial which is equal to the constant identity in the ground ring/field and it is standard to say unit polynomial to mean the polynomial which is UNIT in the ground ring (hence in the polynomial ring as well) it is not logical to say identity polynomial for an arbitrary unit in the ground ring embedded as a polynomial. A unit in a ring is any invertible element in the ring. This is very different from more special concept of the identity (“the unit element”) element.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeDec 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItexAgreed, Zoran. I'm fixing it.

   Agreed, Zoran. I’m fixing it.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeDec 13th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexWhoops, I think that was me. I meant unit in the sense of the identity (i.e. a unital ring...)

   Whoops, I think that was me. I meant unit in the sense of the identity (i.e. a unital ring…)

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeDec 14th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexThen you likely overlooked the possibility to factorize a number.

   Then you likely overlooked the possibility to factorize a number.