Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-categories 2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories accessible adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory kan lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology newpage nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2010
    • (edited Dec 16th 2010)

    started stub on Tannaka duality for geometric stacks, but need to interrupt now.

    The theorem there can be read as justifying the point of view of derived noncommutative geometry to regard the 2-algebra QC(X)QC(X) as a valid replacement for the 1-algebra 𝒪(X)\mathcal{O}(X).

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2010
    • (edited Dec 16th 2010)

    I don’t think this line is right:

    More generally, for (S,𝒪 S)(S, \mathcal{O}_S) a ringed topos, we have

    Hom(S,X)Hom (QC(X);AMod). Hom(S,X) \simeq Hom_\otimes(QC(X); A Mod) \,.

    Surely that should be Hom (QC(X);𝒪 SMod)Hom_\otimes(QC(X); \mathcal{O}_S Mod)?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2010

    clear case of copy-and-paste error. But check out the latest version, with lots more details.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2010
    • (edited Dec 17th 2010)

    I added the details on étale-locally ringed toposes that makes the statement of the main theorem the way I did it correct.

    Have to quit now. Maybe more tomorrow.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeAug 3rd 2014

    Why is this result ’Tannakian’? Can it be seen as some way of reconstructing something from its actions?

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeAug 3rd 2014

    Daniel Schäppi has Tannakian style results where essentially on is reconstructing a Hopf algebroid, ie a groupoid in affine schemes (ie2 a geometric stack) from its category of coherent sheaves. The original case reconstructing a group is the one-object version, BG, where coherent sheaves are more or less representations.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeAug 4th 2014

    OK, so here the idea is that from QC(X)QC(X) (representation-like) and hom spaces to QC(SpecA)QC(Spec A) one can reconstruct XX, whereas classical Tannaka results reconstruct something from its category of representations and single underlying functor (maybe thought of as to the representations of the trivial object).

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)