Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 6th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexcreated [[strongly infinity-connected site]] with the analogous definition, analogous proposition and analogous proof as at [[strongly connected site]]. Only difference is that I define it as a cosifted $\infty$-connected site instead of as a cosifted _locally_ $\infty$-connected site, because I am currently not quite sure about the definition of the latter because my model-category theoretic proofs rely on the existence of a terminal object, without that my standard Quillen adjunction model for the terminal $\infty$-geometric morphism fails and I'd need to think harder. But all these entries of higher connected and local sites currently have the issue that they give sufficient conditions and don't prove necessary conditions, so I think it's okay, but we should keep in mind that there might be refinements of these definitions.

   created strongly infinity-connected site with the analogous definition, analogous proposition and analogous proof as at strongly connected site.

   Only difference is that I define it as a cosifted $\infty$-connected site instead of as a cosifted locally $\infty$-connected site, because I am currently not quite sure about the definition of the latter because my model-category theoretic proofs rely on the existence of a terminal object, without that my standard Quillen adjunction model for the terminal $\infty$-geometric morphism fails and I’d need to think harder.

   But all these entries of higher connected and local sites currently have the issue that they give sufficient conditions and don’t prove necessary conditions, so I think it’s okay, but we should keep in mind that there might be refinements of these definitions.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJan 6th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexQuick general comment: based on what I remember from the Elephant, in general the "necessary" condition will probably be of the form "if a topos has X property, then *there exists* a site with Y property which defines that topos." Since all sorts of wacky sites can define the same topos, it seems unlikely one could find a condition on a particular site which is equivalent to its topos of sheaves having some property. Maybe that is obvious, but I thought I would recall it.

   Quick general comment: based on what I remember from the Elephant, in general the “necessary” condition will probably be of the form “if a topos has X property, then there exists a site with Y property which defines that topos.” Since all sorts of wacky sites can define the same topos, it seems unlikely one could find a condition on a particular site which is equivalent to its topos of sheaves having some property. Maybe that is obvious, but I thought I would recall it.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 6th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexRight, okay I'll think about it more.

   Right, okay I’ll think about it more.