Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2011
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2017

    I don’t understand the definition at locally infinity-connected (infinity,1)-site. Why does it refer to hypercompletion? It seems to me that it should clearly be about the ordinary \infty-topos of sheaves, not its hypercompletion.

    Also, the definition should really be an explicit one in terms of coverages, like that of a locally connected site. The obvious corresponding condition is that all covering sieves have contractible nerves; is that sufficient?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorMarc Hoyois
    • CommentTimeNov 5th 2017

    @Mike It is indeed necessary and sufficient, since a constant presheaf with value XX is a sheaf iff X=lim RX=Map(N(R),X)X=lim_{R} X=Map(N(R),X) for every covering sieve R.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeNov 5th 2017

    I’m having trouble typechecking your equation; can you elaborate it for me?

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 5th 2017
    • (edited Nov 5th 2017)

    Thanks for the alert. I forget why I mentioned hypercompleteness when I created the entry. I suppose one may as well mention it, if it is what one is after, but since the remainder of the entry does not refer back to it anyway, we can as well leave it open. So I have removed the adjective.

    Then I noticed that in prop. 3.1 the “XX” suddenly turned into a “CC”. I have fixed that now, too.

    In #3, the first equivalence is the sheaf condition, and the second its unwinding, where due to the constancy of the presheaf, on the left “XX” denotes the presheaf while on the right it denotes the \infty-groupoid that it is constant on.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeNov 6th 2017

    Thanks, I have added this other characterization to the page.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)