Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2011
   • (edited Mar 22nd 2011)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexhave expanded the first section at [[determinant line bundle]]. Spelled out some more details and then stated the fact that the class of the determinant line bundle of a complex vector bundle is its first Chern-class, and that this statement directly refines to differential cohomology.

   have expanded the first section at determinant line bundle. Spelled out some more details and then stated the fact that the class of the determinant line bundle of a complex vector bundle is its first Chern-class, and that this statement directly refines to differential cohomology.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexHi Urs! I like that you joined the work on this important entry. I started doing this a while ago, but stayed rather cryptic. Now you are bringing some real explanations to it :)

   Hi Urs! I like that you joined the work on this important entry. I started doing this a while ago, but stayed rather cryptic. Now you are bringing some real explanations to it :)

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2011
   • (edited Mar 22nd 2011)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI wanted to mention the example $det$ tomorrow for a talk on differential characteristic classes that I give in Rome, as a very simple and yet insightful example for a characteristic class and was surprised that the evident statement $[det E] = c_1(E)$ for a complex vector bundle $E$ is so hard to find explicitly in the basic literature. One finds plenty of generalized versions of this statement, but for expositional purposes I wanted just this bare one. Thanks to Domenico for tracking down references!

   I wanted to mention the example $det$ tomorrow for a talk on differential characteristic classes that I give in Rome, as a very simple and yet insightful example for a characteristic class and was surprised that the evident statement $[det E] = c_1(E)$ for a complex vector bundle $E$ is so hard to find explicitly in the basic literature. One finds plenty of generalized versions of this statement, but for expositional purposes I wanted just this bare one. Thanks to Domenico for tracking down references!

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeSep 11th 2014
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have cross-linked _[[determinant line bundle]]_ and _[[theta function]]_ a bit more (and _[[vacuum energy]]_) by pointing to ([Freed 87, pages 30-31](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/determinant+line+bundle#Freed87)) (no time for more than just these pointers right now)

   I have cross-linked determinant line bundle and theta function a bit more (and vacuum energy) by pointing to (Freed 87, pages 30-31)

   (no time for more than just these pointers right now)

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 20th 2022
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexWhere the entry used to be vaguley referring to induced fiberwise operations ([here](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/determinant+line+bundle#AnySuchFunctor)) I have added a pointer to the new Remark on these at *[[topological vector bundle]]*, [here](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/topological+vector+bundle#FiberwiseOperations). <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/determinant+line+bundle/23">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/determinant+line+bundle/23">v23</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/determinant+line+bundle">current</a>

   Where the entry used to be vaguley referring to induced fiberwise operations (here) I have added a pointer to the new Remark on these at topological vector bundle, here.

   diff, v23, current