Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory kan lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology natural nforum nlab nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topological topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 26th 2009

    I am starting landscape of string theory vacua -- hah! :-)

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 22nd 2011
    • (edited Jul 22nd 2011)

    I have added a recent reference by Mike Douglas, which stands out as at least clearly acknowledging the problem to be addressed

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 28th 2013

    I took some time to collect and briefly comment on the central references, now listed here.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2018
    • (edited Jun 25th 2018)

    added pointer to today’s Obied-Ooguri-Spodyneiko-Vafa 18.

    Curious situation: After it had influenced much the development of the string theory community’s attention and almost all of its public media perception since 2003, after what must be thousands of followup publications, the argument of KKLT 03 for a large finite number of metastable de Sitter spacetime vacua of type IIB string theory is in the process of being abandoned for being plainly mathematically wrong.

    Apparently the decisive blow was the focused and comprehensive analysis in Danielsson-VanRiet 18 of all the available arguments, which concluded that all this work is based on a mathematical assumption that was never checked and for which there is mounting evidence that it is just false.

    If at the next social gathering smalltalk with your colleagues you need a good argument that physics does need mathematically rigorous proof after all, you’ll have a monumental example here.

    What a waste of energy and time and of media attention! On the other hand, good to see that scientific scepticism is coming back, even if with 15 years of delay.

    diff, v40, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2018

    Interesting!

    In Danielsson-VanRiet 18, they write

    Vasiliev gravity is thought to be the zero-tension limit of string theory, the opposite to the supergravity limit.

    This is some form of higher spin gauge theory?

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2018
    • (edited Jun 25th 2018)

    Vasiliev gravity is thought to be the zero-tension limit of string theory, the opposite to the supergravity limit.

    This is some form of higher spin gauge theory?

    Yes, exactly. All this higher spin stuff supposedly is “just” string field theory in the limit of vanishing string tension.

    This was “well known” since ancient times (I should try to collect reference) which is why I found it ironic and frustrating that in the last years parts of the community made a big deal of the “huge symmetry” found in higher spin theory, thereby ignoring that there is already a “huge and higher” symmetry in string field theory, in the guise of the (super) L L_\infty-algebras. (That’s where the concept of L L_\infty-algebra was first identified!)

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 27th 2018
    • (edited Jun 27th 2018)

    added pointer to followups by Vafa, that became available today: the followup preprint Agrawal-Obied-Steinhardt-Vafa 18 and the slides and recording of Vafa’s talk at Strings18 from two days back: Vafa 18.

    So the trust in the 15 year old arguments is now shattered. One might hope that makes people beware to base the next argument on more solid analysis. Unfortunately, the above reference do not support that hope.

    diff, v41, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 29th 2018
    • (edited Aug 29th 2018)

    That debate over existence of stringy de Sitter is getting big. Looks like I keep logging the exchange on PF here. A pleasure to watch Thomas Van Riet in action (see also here)

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 14th 2018

    Added two new subsections to the References, one on scans of the landscape of type II vacua, the other on scans of the landscape of heterotic vacua

    diff, v54, current

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 19th 2019

    finally gave the Swampland its own References-subsection, here

    diff, v57, current

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 29th 2019

    added pointer to today’s

    • Tom Banks, On the Limits of Effective Quantum Field Theory: Eternal Inflation, Landscapes, and Other Mythical Beasts (arxiv:1910.12817)

    diff, v67, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)