Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorhilbertthm90
   • CommentTimeMay 25th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: hilbertthm90
   Format: MarkdownItexI've been thinking a lot about [[degeneration of Hodge to de Rham spectral sequence]] lately. I checked out the page on the nlab about it. I saw that there was a link to [[Cartier operator]] but no page, so I created it. This actually got me thinking. In some sense degeneration at $E_1$ is "intrinsic" to the derived category $D(X)$ (I just made that up based on what I wrote in the article). There is a naive way to try to prove that if $X$ and $Y$ are derived equivalent and if the SS degenerates for one, the other should too. I couldn't see a way to make it work. Is there an obvious reason this should be true, or an obvious counterexample?

   I’ve been thinking a lot about degeneration of Hodge to de Rham spectral sequence lately. I checked out the page on the nlab about it. I saw that there was a link to Cartier operator but no page, so I created it.

   This actually got me thinking. In some sense degeneration at $E_1$ is “intrinsic” to the derived category $D(X)$ (I just made that up based on what I wrote in the article). There is a naive way to try to prove that if $X$ and $Y$ are derived equivalent and if the SS degenerates for one, the other should too. I couldn’t see a way to make it work. Is there an obvious reason this should be true, or an obvious counterexample?