Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 1st 2011

    In order to accompany the nCafe discussion I have started to add some content to the entry Euler characteristic

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 1st 2011

    added the notion of “homotopical Euler characteristic” for “\infty-groupoid cardinality” and mentioned how Leinster cardinality interpolates between that and “homological” Euler characteristic.

    Added stub sections for Euler char of enriched and higher categories and for Gauss-Bonnet theorem

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJun 2nd 2011

    I have added some more discussion of the symmetric-monoidal Euler characteristic, and rearranged a little bit. I think it would be better to group the various definitions by style, rather than by input data – the “homological” Euler characteristic of a topological space fits into the same picture as the Euler characteristic of a chain complex and the symmetric monoidal notion, whereas the “homotopical” one is a different sort of beast.

    I’m also not sold on the phrase “homotopical Euler characteristic”. The notion of “Euler characteristic of a topological space” is ancient and well-established, and I don’t think we should try to bifurcate its meaning. Especially since we have a perfectly good alternate name: “\infty-groupoid cardinality”. I know that the “Euler characteristic of a category” reduces to both in special cases, but I would rather just say that “the Euler characteristic of a groupoid, considered as a category, is its groupoid cardinality”.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 2nd 2011

    Sure, thanks. I have edited a bit more, accordingly. Also added a brief comment on Euler char of higher categories and added plenty of references, using John’s material.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJun 2nd 2011

    Looks great, thanks!

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2012
    • (edited May 20th 2012)

    I added the reference by Efremovich and Rudyak which singles Euler characteristic of finite CW complexes as the only (up to multiplicative constant) additive homotopy invariant and the related 1966 reference by C.T.C. Wall on arithmetic invariants of finite simplicial complexes, with a free pdf link at Canadian J. Math.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 23rd 2019
    • (edited Mar 23rd 2019)

    added the following statement (here):


    Let XX and YY be closed manifolds (topological or differentiable) of even dimension. Then the Euler characteristic of their connected sum is the sum of their separate Euler characteristics, minus 2:

    χ(XY)=χ(X)+χ(Y)2 \chi \big( X \sharp Y \big) \;=\; \chi \big(X\big) + \chi \big(Y\big) -2

    added this also to connected sum

    diff, v28, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)