Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality education elliptic-cohomology fibration foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory kan lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories newpage noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 9th 2011

    I am in the process of brushing up and expanding the entry local net of observables.

    I have entirely reorganized the Definition-section: it starts now with the general basic definition on arbitrary spacetimes, then gives a list of all the add-on axioms that people consider.

    I also finally noticed that this page coexisted with a synonymous entry that I have now moved to causal net of algebras > history, making “local nets” redirect to “causal net”. I made sure to move all the information over.

    I am not quite done yet, will continue to add stuff. Maybe a little later.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJul 10th 2011

    I put causal net of algebras > history in the standard format.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 2nd 2013

    at local net of observables I have slightly expanded the section on Einstein causality and then added below that a brief section on “strong locality” (an axiom in fact slightly weaker than Einstein locality).

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2016

    Any chance that some examples could be added to the article local net?

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2016

    Todd, I have been waiting for years for you to ask this question! :-)

    There are the standard textbooks on AQFT, but I’d recommend this article here:

    • Christian Baer, Nicolas Ginoux, Classical and Quantum Fields on Lorentzian Manifolds, Global Differential Geometry, Springer Proceedings in Math. 17, Springer-Verlag (2011), 359-400 (arXiv:1104.1158)
    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2016

    Where are the examples of local nets in that paper?

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 8th 2016
    • (edited Mar 8th 2016)

    I’d be inclined to say: “In the whole article!” but maybe what you are looking for is the statement of theorems 3.10 and 3.20, which assert that what has been constructed are indeed local nets.

    (The authors don’t use the term “local net of observables”, they say just “quantum field theory” for it.)

    Maybe it helps if I give a quick guide to how the construction works:

    One wants to functorially assigns C *C^\ast-algebras to spacetimes for a fixed free field theory. The present authors are careful and observe that generally the domain of the functor should be spacetimes equipped with vector bundles (field bundles) and with a hyperbolic operator on their sections. That gives their category GlobHypGreenGlobHypGreen in def. 3.1. This may be restricted to trivial vector bundles if desired, as implicitly done in much of the literature. For instance for the standard example of scalar field theory the vector bundle would be taken to be the trivial \mathbb{C}-fiber bundle throughout.

    The procedure of the quantization construction then goes as follows:

    1. Produce the space of solutions of the hyperbolic operator on each spacetime, expressed in terms of its Green’s functions. This is the content of section 2 for many standard examples of field theories.

    2. Produce symplectic structure on the space of solutions (to make them become “phase spaces” of physical states). This happens from prop. 3.4. to lemma 3.8, see top of page 14 for the conclusion.

    3. Quantize. Since here we are dealing with free fields this is functorial, the assignment of Weyl algebras to symplectic vector spaces. Middle of p. 14 for the bosonic case with details in appendix A, and section 3.2 for the fermionic case.

    Theorems 3.10 and 3.20 assert that what has been constructed thereby are indeed local nets.

    The last section 4 is about extracting quantum states and quantum fields (in the sense of operator valued distributions) from the local net of observables.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMar 8th 2016

    Thanks! Those are useful pointers, and pretty much what I was looking for, I think.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2017

    I have expanded a little the Idea-section at local net of observables.