Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2011

    I have been trying to collect some information at Coq.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 10th 2011

    I have added to the References-section at Coq

    • a pointer to a web-interface that runs Coq;

    • a pointer to a tool that allows to display Coq proofs from static Coq-files without having to load everything into a Coq-system itself.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 24th 2011

    Jelle Herold kindly added a section learning Coq to Coq.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeNov 24th 2011

    Yes, that was kind! Thank you, Jelle.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 24th 2011
    • (edited Nov 24th 2011)

    Since one needs to have already some experience with the Coq software environment in order to know what to do (and to think) when stumbling across a page like https://github.com/andrejbauer/Homotopy/tree/master/OberwolfachTutorial, and since it never occured to me (!) that I need to click on the word “raw” in order to get a pdf-file, I have split the pointer to that tutorial off as a category: Reference-entry

    Oberwolfach HoTT-Coq tutorial,

    uploaded the pdf there, and added some directions.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2019
    • (edited Jun 18th 2019)

    added pointer to

    • jsCoq, a ready-to-use online Coq environment

    diff, v29, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2019
    • (edited Jun 18th 2019)

    and also to

    diff, v30, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2019

    beautified the formatting of this reference:

    but this seems a little thin a pointer. Any expert who cares about whatever issue is meant to be pointed out here might want to expand just a bit.

    diff, v30, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthoratmacen
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2019

    Re #8: I’m not sure what you think is missing that would make sense to put on this page: O’Connor already says that ordinal analysis techniques don’t currently handle Coq’s theory, and some may find this worrisome.

    Wait you mean to put something like what I just wrote next to the link?

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2019

    Yes! The entry deserves to be expanded a little here and there by some expert. Think of all the kids that visit this page.

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthoratmacen
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2019

    Changed the parenthetical summary of the “Believing In-Consistency” reference. It now links to ordinal analysis instead of predicativity. They’re related, but O’Connor focuses on ordinal analysis.

    diff, v31, current

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthoratmacen
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2019

    Added a “Relation to Predicativity” subsection to ordinal analysis to compensate. I hope these changes are not too far off what you wanted.

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2019

    Yes, thanks for doing this.

    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthorHugo Herbelin
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2022

    Add the connection between Coq and the acronym CoC.

    diff, v33, current

    • CommentRowNumber15.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2022

    added pointer to:

    diff, v34, current