Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeNov 21st 2011

    Added to simple group an example I was given on MO: the simple group of cardinality κ\kappa, given by taking the smallest normal subgroup of Aut(κ)Aut(\kappa) containing the 3-cycles. This is essentially the ’even’ permutations for an infinite set.

    This is nice, because I was trying to think of a simple group (or one with only small normal subgroups) with inaccessible cardinality, and some obvious tricks weren’t working.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMar 26th 2018

    Added to simple group the easy-to-prove proposition that a directed colimit of simple groups is also simple, which enters into David’s observation above.

    Also mean to add at some point the proof of simplicity of finite alternating groups A nA_n for n5n \geq 5, but need more time to examine which ones out there I think are ’nice’.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeMar 26th 2018

    I just learned that Volume 7 of the classification has been published !! I updated classification of finite simple groups to reflect this, since it stated (from ten years ago) that six volumes were available.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMar 27th 2018

    As part of this morning’s work, I recorded the result at simple group that every group (finite or infinite) embeds in a simple group.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMar 27th 2018

    I tried to look into the matter of skepticism (about the classification theorem), especially with regard to Conway, but the only concrete lead I found suggests that the correct word here is “pessimism”, not “skepticism”. Have a look.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeMar 27th 2018
    • (edited Mar 27th 2018)

    Serre talks about his attitude in this talk. I’ve linked to a part where he makes comments about the classification in response to an audience comment, but IIRC he makes several comments through the body of the talk. To paraphrase, he says something like “Ashbacher says there is a proof, because he sees the various pieces that are in the literature, and essentially how they all connect, but for us, I will not consider that as a proof, if there are pieces you have to arrange (after all many more theorems are like that)”. He goes on to say the the Classification is acceptable, if people state it as a hypothesis to a theorem: the theorem is then true modulo the Classification. Serre goes on to say the situation is much worse for the ATLAS, but has since reversed his view on that, given recent independent verification work.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)