Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 30th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have included at [[geometric quantization]] the definition of _quantum operators_ associated with a given function on phase space in geometric quantization. Then I decided to split it off to dedicated entry _[[quantum operator]]_.

   I have included at geometric quantization the definition of quantum operators associated with a given function on phase space in geometric quantization. Then I decided to split it off to dedicated entry quantum operator.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeNov 30th 2011
   • (edited Nov 30th 2011)
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexI am interested who uses the terminology "quantum operator"? I am used to say [[quantum observable]] followed an old tradition. This looks reasonable as in particular as an operator it is just a plain operator, not any kind of a quantum analogue (though some have such generalized operators in noncommutative setups when some people do talk about a quantum operator living in a space of usual operators tensored with some geometric noncommutative algebra or alike). As an observable it is really a quantum analogue of a classical observable. But I read mainly older literature and I am not much familiar with new books and papers on the subject.

   I am interested who uses the terminology “quantum operator”? I am used to say quantum observable followed an old tradition. This looks reasonable as in particular as an operator it is just a plain operator, not any kind of a quantum analogue (though some have such generalized operators in noncommutative setups when some people do talk about a quantum operator living in a space of usual operators tensored with some geometric noncommutative algebra or alike). As an observable it is really a quantum analogue of a classical observable. But I read mainly older literature and I am not much familiar with new books and papers on the subject.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 30th 2011
   • (edited Nov 30th 2011)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexTrue. I find there is a bit of a terminology mess. I was following here the text A. Echeverria-Enriquez, M.C. Munoz-Lecanda, N. Roman-Roy, C. Victoria-Monge, _Mathematical Foundations of Geometric Quantization_ ([arXiv](http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/9904008)) which uses "quantum operator" throughout. But at the very least I should add more cross-links to the respective $n$Lab entries. I'll do that now

   True. I find there is a bit of a terminology mess.

   I was following here the text

   A. Echeverria-Enriquez, M.C. Munoz-Lecanda, N. Roman-Roy, C. Victoria-Monge, Mathematical Foundations of Geometric Quantization (arXiv)

   which uses “quantum operator” throughout.

   But at the very least I should add more cross-links to the respective $n$Lab entries. I’ll do that now

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeNov 30th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks for clarifying your perspective out and the reference.

   Thanks for clarifying your perspective out and the reference.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 30th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexOkay, I have renamed the entry to "quantum observable". That's indeed better. I have added a brief link to it from [[observable]]. Eventually that entry deserves a bit more attention to make it more coherent.

   Okay, I have renamed the entry to “quantum observable”. That’s indeed better.

   I have added a brief link to it from observable. Eventually that entry deserves a bit more attention to make it more coherent.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2017
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItex(years later...) added a little bit of more actual content to _[[prequantum operator]]_.

   (years later…)

   added a little bit of more actual content to prequantum operator.