Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories itex k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes science set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2011
    • (edited Dec 5th 2011)

    At comma object, Eduardo Pareja-Tobes put a query box which does not seem to have been ‘answered’. This was some time ago it seems.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 6th 2011

    Thanks! I’ve replied and suggested to continue here.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeDec 6th 2011

    This same person also wrote for us factorization category and twisted arrow category.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeFeb 27th 2018

    Six years later, I’m copying the conversation here and deleting the query box:

    Eduardo Pareja-Tobes: Not sure about this but, with the strict definition I think you end up having specified isos all around at the level of morphisms; comma categories as normally defined are comma objects in Cat, but not strict ones (of course they’re equivalent to the strict ones). I remember reading something like this in Makkai-Paré Accessible categories book

    Mike Shulman: As far as I can tell, they are strict. Given DD, functors p:DAp':D\to A, q:DBq':D\to B and a natural transformation σ:fpgq\sigma:f p'\Rightarrow g q', these data specify exactly for every dDd\in D, a triple (p(d),q(d),σ d)(p'(d), q'(d), \sigma_d) which is an object of the comma category. Perhaps you are remembering a related remark about pseudo-pullbacks versus iso-comma objects? (If you post your comments at the nForum, for instance on this discussion, other people will be more likely to see it.)

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorjesuslop
    • CommentTimeDec 14th 2019

    I’m seeing here that the diagram in the definition section, that is !included, renders badly with excessive clipping. I’m rewriting it in terms of \array and painting the 2-cell α\alpha with double stroke instead of single.

    diff, v34, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)