Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2011

    Thought I’d write up some old notes at symmetric product of circles (linked from unitary group, explanation to come on symmetric product of circles). Not finished yet, but have to leave it for now.

    (I was incensed to discover that to look at the source article for the material for this to check that I’m remembering it right - I last looked at it about 10 years ago - I have to pay 30 UKP. The article is 3 pages long. That’s 10UKP per page! So I’m going from vague memories and “working it out afresh”.)

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2011
    • (edited Dec 8th 2011)

    Andrew, I’m confused by your definition 1. I expect what you mean is to take the joint coequalizer of the maps X nX nX^n \to X^n induced by permuting coordinates, and this can be phrased equivalently as the coequalizer of the pair of maps

    σΣ nX nS n×X nαπX n\coprod_{\sigma \in \Sigma_n} X^n \cong S_n \times X^n \stackrel{\overset{\pi}{\to}}{\underset{\alpha}{\to}} X^n

    where π\pi is projection onto the second coordinate, and α\alpha is the canonical S nS_n-action. Is that what you meant?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeDec 8th 2011

    Todd, probably! I was trying to be “fancy” and put a categorical definition (this is the nlab, after all). I was a bit surprised that we didn’t have a page symmetric product already as it seems a fairly obvious notion.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeDec 9th 2011
    • (edited Dec 9th 2011)

    Shouldn’t the term be symmetric power? We have an article on that (with a definition that respects multiplicities), albeit restricted to a different context. (Probably that article should be left as it is, at symmetric algebra, with a new page symmetric power for the concept in an arbitrary symmetric monoidal category.)

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeDec 9th 2011

    I think that in topology it’s more usual to talk of the symmetric product. Nonetheless, as we have the page symmetric power then I took out the general definition from this page and linked to that page.

    Also completed the proof of the description of SP n(S 1)SP^n(S^1) and added that of SP n()SP^n(\mathbb{R}). Still to do is the connection to unitary matrices.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorjim_stasheff
    • CommentTimeDec 9th 2011
    Yes, in topology it's called the symmetric product. Recent flurry of activity over at algtop mailing list
    in re: cells for SP^infty(S^n)