Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-categories 2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topological topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeJan 13th 2012

    Forgot to mention that I started something on Coxeter group. A lot of it is examples, particularly finite reflection groups (where the classification was effectively stated). If someone knows how to draw Coxeter diagrams, those would be great to include.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 14th 2012

    Thanks. I have done some formatting and bookkeeping to it:

    I have added the table of contents, added a floating context table, added some hyperlinks, made the theorems numbered (even if there is just one at the moment) and added the canonical redirects (“Coxeter groups”, “Coxeter matrix”, “Coxeter matrices”, “Coxeter diagram”, “Coxeter diagrams”).

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 7th 2018
    • (edited Dec 7th 2018)

    equipped with paragraph on The group F4 with hyperlinks:

    • changed “regular polyhedron” to “regular polytope

    • changed “D 4D_4” to “D4

    [edit: ah, the last one needs fixing…]

    diff, v8, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 7th 2018

    By the way, the entry keeps saying

    Its Coxeter diagram is:

    but then nothing ever follows (no graphics, no link, just blanks).

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 7th 2018
    • (edited Dec 7th 2018)

    And that statement about the vertices of the 24-cell forming the group “D 4D_4” is wrong, no? They form 2T.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeDec 7th 2018

    Where to add that the 120 vertices of the 600-cell form the binary icosahedral group? This is very much John Baez land.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)