Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
at associative operad I have made explict the links to symmetric operad and planar operad, as need be.
I added to the idea section a terminological-warning remark in regard to the associativity axiom. This article calls symmetric operads ”ordinary” - I know that the symmetric case was studied before the planar one, but shall we maintain this nomenclature?
I added a further reference to ∞-algebra over an (∞,1)-operad.
Hi,
thanks for the comments. You may have to tell me which specific entry a comment refers to.
Concerning “ordinary operads”: let’s change all remaining occurences of this into pointers to symmetric operad (if that is meant) or indeed to planar operad, if that is meant. That’s what I created these entries for!
But you have have caught more places where the links could be inserted than I have. Don’t hesitate to edit the entry accordingly.
You may have to tell me which specific entry a comment refers to.
I referred to associative operad.
1 to 5 of 5