Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 22nd 2012

    I needed an entry to be able to point to which collects pointers to the various entries on “dualities” in string theory. So I created one: duality in string theory.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 24th 2012
    • (edited Feb 24th 2012)

    I have started to work on a hyperlinked overview table of string dualities.

    It’s far from done and not quite correct yet. But I need to call it quits now.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2018

    I included a link to Hořava-Witten theory, since this page deals with a series of dualities. Is there an image of the whole web of dualities to grab from somewhere?

    On the page it says

    so that subsequent T-duality along the second factor yields type IIA string theory (in its F-theory-incarnation)

    Shouldn’t that be type IIB?

    diff, v17, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2018
    • (edited May 2nd 2018)

    Thanks for spotting this (unfortunate) typo! Fixed now.

    Is there an image of the whole web of dualities to grab from somewhere?

    Working on it: jpg

    The full web won’t be possible to arrange on a page: too detailed, too high-dimensional. But sometimes in the literature people have big diagrams of small snapshots. Will have to remind myself where I saw good ones, will include them then.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2018

    Perhaps “the whole web” is too much to ask. With compactifications included it really is quite a thing. See how in Umbral Moonshine and String Duality compactification to low dimensions is related to the various moonshines.

    The author goes on to mention

    the prospect that string theory could provide an intuitive reason for why the sporadic groups exist.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2018
    • (edited May 2nd 2018)

    Thanks for the pointer. For a moment I thought these 2d compactifications might help answer the question here (whether anyone has dicussed the “M-wave” as a 2\mathbb{Z}_2-fixed point, in analogy to the M5 and the MO9). But in the time that I have spent with it, I couldn’t see the light…

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2018

    Would that be right though to see M-theory as some kind of extraordinarily rich exceptional object with a huge and diverse range of important consequences realised through dualities, limits and compactifications, from Geometric Langlands to Moonshine? So working backwards to find out what such a exceptional thing might be, it pays to attend to as much of the network of its manifestations as we can find out.

    Would it be the case that the closest parts of the network ’screen off’ more distant parts, in the sense that, e.g., these Moonshine results in the paper in #5 as appearing in low dimensional compactifications are already ’derivable’ from the close duals (the string theories, 11d supergravity)?

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2018


    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 9th 2018

    Is it just me and my browser or can others also not see the tables render properly at duality in string theory? On the other hand, individually they work, e.g., heterotic S-duality – table.

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
    • CommentTimeOct 9th 2018
    • (edited Oct 9th 2018)

    Fixed by re-rendering.

    There are things I wish to do to detect pages with problematic rendering, and also there are things that need doing with the renderer itself. Do not quite have the time just now, but hopefully soon.

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 18th 2019
    • (edited Jan 18th 2019)

    added pointer to some more of the old reviews:

    diff, v19, current

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 8th 2019
    • (edited Mar 8th 2019)

    added pointer to today’s

    for discussion amplifying the role of category theory, and higher geometry.

    diff, v20, current

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 9th 2020

    added pointer to:

    diff, v31, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)