Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2012
   • (edited Feb 28th 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI am fiddling with an entry _[[table - models for (infinity,1)-operads]]_ meant to allow to see 10+ different model categories and their main Quillen equivalences at one glance. I guess there are better ways to typeset this. (Volunteers please feel free to lend a hand!) But for the time being I'll settle with what I have so far.

   I am fiddling with an entry table - models for (infinity,1)-operads meant to allow to see 10+ different model categories and their main Quillen equivalences at one glance.

   I guess there are better ways to typeset this. (Volunteers please feel free to lend a hand!) But for the time being I’ll settle with what I have so far.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeFeb 29th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have been further editing / creating the entries in this table. But not done yet. Will continue tomorrow.

   I have been further editing / creating the entries in this table. But not done yet. Will continue tomorrow.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeFeb 29th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexokay, I have been working on expanding and polishing the entries * _[[model structure on dendroidal sets]]_ * _[[model structure on sSet-operads]]_ . The main definitions and statements should now all be there. (But no proofs yet.)

   okay, I have been working on expanding and polishing the entries

   • model structure on dendroidal sets

   • model structure on sSet-operads .

   The main definitions and statements should now all be there. (But no proofs yet.)

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeFeb 29th 2012
   • (edited Feb 29th 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexI think it would be more clear to have a clean diagram (nodes and arrows, labelled with names) without the table and cell boundaries. With the numerous cell boundaries, including for empty cells, it is too messy to follow, at least to me.

   I think it would be more clear to have a clean diagram (nodes and arrows, labelled with names) without the table and cell boundaries. With the numerous cell boundaries, including for empty cells, it is too messy to follow, at least to me.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeFeb 29th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexNow there are at least the main definitions in * [[model structure for Segal operads]]; * [[model structure for dendroidal complete Segal spaces]].

   Now there are at least the main definitions in

   • model structure for Segal operads;

   • model structure for dendroidal complete Segal spaces.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeFeb 29th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexZoran, sure, as I said in the second paragraph of #1...

   Zoran,

   sure, as I said in the second paragraph of #1…

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorChris SchommerPries
   • CommentTimeFeb 29th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Chris SchommerPries
   Format: MarkdownItexYou are mixing left and right Quillen equivalences in your table. This might be confusing.

   You are mixing left and right Quillen equivalences in your table. This might be confusing.

8. • CommentRowNumber8.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeFeb 29th 2012
   • (edited Feb 29th 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexTrue. I could add plenty of additional useful information, but the typesetting is in the way. Anyone willing to start turning this into a decent hyperlinked SVG table of contents in the spirit of [this diagram toc](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/topological+vector+space#ImportantSubclasses)? If we did this, we could add also a third dimension with various further localizations. Meanwhile, I am adding a section on $\mathcal{O}$-monoidal $(\infty,1)$-categories.

   True. I could add plenty of additional useful information, but the typesetting is in the way.

   Anyone willing to start turning this into a decent hyperlinked SVG table of contents in the spirit of this diagram toc?

   If we did this, we could add also a third dimension with various further localizations.

   Meanwhile, I am adding a section on $\mathcal{O}$-monoidal $(\infty,1)$-categories.