Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I have been expanding and polishing the entry Heisenberg group.
This had existed in bad shape for quite a while, but now it’s maybe getting into better shape.
I tried to spend some sentences on issues which I find are rarely highlighted appropriately in the literature. So there is discussion now of the fact that
there are different Lie groups for a given Heisenberg Lie algebra,
and the appearance of an “i” in [q,p]=i may be all understood as not picking the simply conncted ones of these;
I also added remarks on the relation to Poisson brackets, and symplectomorphisms.
In this context: either I am dreaming, or there is a mistake in the Wikipedia entry Poisson bracket - Lie algebra.
There it says that the Poisson bracket is the Lie algebra of the group of symplectomorphisms. But instead, it is the Lie algebra of a central extension of the group of Hamiltonian symplectomorphisms.
added pointer to:
(here and elsewhere, such as at Heisenberg Lie algebra)
added a couple more references on the “integer Heisenberg group”:
Roman Budylin: Conjugacy classes in discrete Heisenberg groups, Sbornik: Mathematics 205 8 (2014) 1069–1079 [arXiv:1405.5499, doi:10.1070/SM2014v205n08ABEH004410]
Jayadev S. Athreya, Ioannis Konstantoulas: Lattice deformations in the Heisenberg group, Groups, Geometry and Dynamics 14 3 (2020) 1007–1022 [arXiv:1510.01433, doi:10.4171/ggd/572]
1 to 3 of 3