Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2009

    created (finally) lax monoidal functor (redirecting monoidal functor to that) and strong monoidal functor.

    Hope I got the relation to 2-functors right. I remember there was some subtlety to be aware of, but I forget which one. I could look it up, but I guess you can easily tell me.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2009

    Ah, I thought better of it and have everything now just at monoidal functor

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 8th 2016

    The definition at monoidal functor used to be stated without the associators, but then there were a dozen lines of commentary on how to put them in.

    Now I have just put them in. :-)

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorPeter Heinig
    • CommentTimeJul 18th 2017
    • (edited Jul 18th 2017)

    Is the definition of lax monoidal functor between monoidal bicategories in the sense of Gordon–Power–Street already documented on the nLab?

    Remarks. monoidal functor appears to be about monoidal categories only. Motivation is partly studying Chapter 13 of Garner–Shulman Adv Math 289.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 18th 2017
    • (edited Jul 18th 2017)

    Is the definition of lax monoidal functor between monoidal bicategories in the sense of Gordon–Power–Street already documented on the nLab?

    It seems that this is not the case.

    monoidal functor appears to be about monoidal categories only.

    And that’s how it should be. The concept for monoidal 2-categories should go under monoidal 2-functor.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeSep 19th 2021

    Define strict monoidal functors. There is an existing redirect for this term, but it was not defined.

    diff, v45, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 19th 2021
    • (edited Sep 19th 2021)

    replaced “identities” with “identity morphisms” (here)

    diff, v46, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorJ-B Vienney
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2022

    Changed a little bit the presentation of the definition by distinguishing the functor and the coherence maps

    diff, v47, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthormaxsnew
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2023

    x-ref with the article on change of base for enriched categories

    diff, v48, current

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2023

    added pointer to:

    diff, v49, current

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 4th 2023

    added pointer to:

    diff, v50, current

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 2nd 2023
    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 18th 2024

    Unclear what “calvin lee” in #13 really did. The edit history shows no change (so he might have edited the redirects or the like, which isn’t caught by the edit history).

  1. Added some relationships between various categories of monoidal categories.

    Aaron David Fairbanks

    diff, v54, current