Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2012

    I have added some first content to generalized Reedy model structure.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 27th 2012

    I have been adding a bunch of further details to generalized Reedy model structure.

    I wanted to break down the full proof into steps in a way that lends itself to presentation in a seminar. But I guess so far I mainly just copied it, just adding a few intermediate steps here and there. To be continued.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2012

    Okay, I have polished a bit more. Should now be readable and fairly complete.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2014
    • (edited Jul 8th 2014)

    Looking at Berger-Moerdijk’s article, it seems to me that a generalized Reedy category produces only model structures built out of the projective model structures on group actions; to use injective model structures one would need the dual notion (the definition of generalized Reedy category not being self-dual). This is what I get from their Remark 1.8. But our page generalized Reedy model structure seems to be saying that the same notion suffices for both kinds of model structure. Is that right?

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2014

    Hm, I remember that issue from back when I wrote the entry (which was when I gave our group seminar about it). But I don’t remember now the argument. I’ll try to check.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeMay 18th 2018
    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeMay 18th 2018

    The claim discussed in the MathOverflow question was added by Urs Schreiber in revision 32.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 18th 2018
    • (edited May 18th 2018)

    Thanks for the alert! I forget what I thought when I wrote this in rev 32. For the moment I have implemented the most lazy fix now: this example.

    Notice that this concerns the entry Reedy model structure, maybe we should move discussion to that thread

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)